ALCS Game 1: State of the Natetion

Finally, finally, finally a game where both Nate and the offense were in agreement. TOOK YOU ALL LONG ENOUGH. Sheesh.

This was not one of Nate’s most spectacular starts: 6 hits over 5 innings is fairly eh and could’ve been horrible, but the A’s obligingly stranded 5 men over that time, and the only reason the other baserunners weren’t “stranded” was because they were thrown out on double plays and fielders’ choices. The Tigers also had 6 hits over the first 5 innings (or 7, if you count Eric Chavez’s bobbling of Magglio’s ball in the third as a hit, which I don’t, so nyah), but they clustered them together instead of spreading them apart, and the result was 5 runs in 2 of those innings. The moral of the story is: clumping is good for you.

The bullpen did their thing, ‘though again, not without their moments. Fernando had a couple of almost-strikes called balls and seemed to work himself up into a furious lather as a result (Pudge, recognizing this, went out to talk to him. It wasn’t just Fernando, though. The ump had a pretty tight zone all game). Zumaya gave up the sole run and was saved more damage via a nifty play by Inge where a ball bonked off his (Zoom’s) foot and Inge came charging halfway across the infield to grab it and chuck it to first for the out. If Inge didn’t make that play Payton would’ve been safe at first and who knows how the inning would’ve spun out. The crowd didn’t like it but replays showed Payton was plainly out, so I stick my tongue out at you, Oakland.

Jonesy looked pretty good, except he walked the leadoff guy, and in his case the leadoff guy was Nick Swisher, and I hate Nick Swisher. Thus, not OK.

The A’s bullpen looked equally good, actually, but fortunately for the Tigers, Zito did not. I’ll admit, after the first couple innings I started psyching myself up to yell things like, “Barry Zito is pitching a perfect game!” if I had to, because DAMN was that curveball ON. The sink on that thing when it’s going well really kinda takes your breath away. And it looked very much like that was going to continue in the 3rd when all of a sudden who should come along but MR. BRANDON INGE, edging a home run around the foul pole and generally being awesome, you know, as he does.

Inge’s homer was an unfortunate turning point for Zeets, because after that he gave up a double, a walk, another walk, and Magglio’s RBI hit/Chavez’s error before he could get the final out of the inning. He no doubt harbored hopes of getting back to his pre-Inge form in the next inning, but Pudge said, “Nuh uh, Cali boy,” and homered to lead it off. From there it went walk, fielder’s choice, RBI double, groundout to first, RBI single, single, and that was it for Zito.

Zito’s a veteran, so I would normally hesitate to say that a couple of home runs rattled him up and threw him off, but gosh, it sure looks that way, doesn’t it?

The most worrying story to come out of today (for Tigers fans) is of course the possible exploding of Sean Casey’s calf, something that FOX felt the need to replay in slow motion over and over again until you, the hapless viewer, could actually feel your own calf exploding in sympathy. Reports right now range from “spasms”, which sounds like something that can be massaged out with some temperature therapy and a skilled pair of hands, to the more vague and ominous “strain”, which could mean anything from “mild soreness that will go away in a couple days” to “oops, I tore it clean off the bone.”

To be honest, we can’t really afford to have ANYONE get injured. Looking over our lineup tonight, you take any one of those guys out (except for Craig on one of his cold nights, and even he made a spectacular catch to get Fernando out of the inning tonight) and you’re looking at a big, ugly, suppurating hole of a wound in the lineup. Casey’s a fairly vital left-handed bat and he’s been pretty bloody helpful since he got here. Not to mention how the Tigers started playing the LAST time one of their infielders went down…

Still, it was a win, and we saw some good things. As Jay Payton said, “For a team that’s supposed to be hackin’, they’ve been sittin’ [patient].” And we were treated to the sight Dan Haren flossing in the dugout. You just don’t get to see that every day.

8 responses to “ALCS Game 1: State of the Natetion

  1. Since the A’s swept the punchless Twins, and since the Tigers embarassed the hated Jankees, I have declared myself an honorary Tigers fan.
    Craig Monroe reminds me so much of Torii Hunter. Even has many of the same manerisms in the batter’s box (except maybe not flailing at the low outside stuff as much as Hunter). And the FOX announcers even got the inflection right — MONroe.
    These Tigs are fun to watch!

  2. That K to Scutaro, man. 96mph? Did you know Nate could even get it up that hard? Everyone in my family jumped off the couch and screamed. We couldn’t believe it. I was impressed with what he did after he put the first two men on and Leyland came out to “chat.” Also, Zito, it’s not cute to be making excuses in your blog.

  3. Not to doubt the Tigers – because they’re clearly for real – but was the FOX gun accurate last night? They had Robertson in the upper 90s and Todd Jones throwing 95/96. Since when do they throw that hard?

  4. Jim, welcome to the fuzzy striped bandwagon. :P
    itpyp, Ben, yeah. See, I always assume FOX is juicing their gun a little. I wish I’d been able to see what the stadium gun was showing but, then again, I don’t know much about how Oakland’s gun tends to run either. There are some parks I trust more than others; Fenway’s gun tends to be pretty accurate (they don’t exactly need to show hard-throwers to get the crowd to come in) and the Metrodome, for instance, always seems a little off to me.
    But the networks can get pretty hysterical. FOX pumps everything up just so they can use their stupid little flame animation when the velocity gets up to a certain point. I’m also somewhat skeptical that Zumaya has EVER, in reality, hit 103… I’m quite sure he’s touching 100 regularly, and 101 occasionally, but I think 103 is probably from some overexcitable radar guns.

  5. Magically delicious!

  6. That gun was definitely inaccurate last night…Rodney at 100 mph? Doubt it.
    Great win though.
    Bless You Boys

  7. Absolutely yes to everybody on that radar gun. I was scoffing at that all night? 103??? That’s a joke. But I guess it’s good television.
    Very satisfying overall; the A’s looked terrible. We just have to hope this Casey thing turns out not to matter.
    Now to what REALLY concerns me: this monROE vs MONroe issue. This has always made me nervous — does anyone know which is correct? Has anyone asked him?

  8. Matt:
    Most teams provide a pronunciation guide as part of their media package. Most announcers ignore it, so just because they say it that way doesn’t make it right. But I do think MONroe is correct.
    I lived for a time in Monroe County, Indiana, and the locals pronounced it MONroe, which leads me to conclude that anybody south of I-80 probably prounounces it that way. Craig Monroe is from Texarkana, Texas.
    Jim H.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s